Diagnostic Kits/The licensing of DNA patents by US academic institutions: Difference between revisions

From Commons Based Research
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(added Pressman Highlights)
 
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
***Non-profits were more selective about when to apply for a patent.   
***Non-profits were more selective about when to apply for a patent.   
**Licensing Behavior
**Licensing Behavior
**For both entities, licensing was most often used as a method of commercialization.  Licensing for research was very infrequent.
***For both entities, licensing was most often used as a method of commercialization.  Licensing for research was very infrequent.
**One important difference found was that nonprofits were more than twice as likely to license exclusively as compared to for-profit companies.   
***One important difference found was that nonprofits were more than twice as likely to license exclusively as compared to for-profit companies.   


Exclusivity
Exclusivity
see Schissel et al (footnote 8)
see Schissel et al (footnote 8)

Revision as of 14:15, 11 September 2009

Pressman, L. et al., 2006. The licensing of DNA patents by US academic institutions: an empirical survey. Nat Biotech, 24(1), 31-39

  • (Pressman, L. et al., 2006) The Pressman article reports on an interview which investigates DNA patents at Universities in the United States. The focus of the article is split between:
    • patenting and out-licensing strategies of
    • licensing negotiations: exclusivity, uses, and terms
    • Protection of non-patented technologies: MTAs, NDAs
  • Institutions chosen for the study had patents of inventions using human DNA and both for profit and non-profits were sampled. The study found that for profit and non-profit entities approach patent and licenses differently:
    • Patenting Behavior
      • For profits more often fill patent applications for all new technologies and then deciding what to pursue based on commercial interest.
      • Non-profits were more selective about when to apply for a patent.
    • Licensing Behavior
      • For both entities, licensing was most often used as a method of commercialization. Licensing for research was very infrequent.
      • One important difference found was that nonprofits were more than twice as likely to license exclusively as compared to for-profit companies.

Exclusivity see Schissel et al (footnote 8)