Diagnostic Kits/IP Profile of Universities working in Kits: Difference between revisions

From Commons Based Research
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
==Identify these cases and treat them as entities that will also be placed in our mapping device (the quadrants)==
==Identify these cases and treat them as entities that will also be placed in our mapping device (the quadrants)==
==Identify what universities are the “Microsofts” of the field and what companies are the “IBMs” of the field (Use the questionnaire to guide your research when appropriate - Carol will select specific relevant questions)==
==Identify what universities are the “Microsofts” of the field and what companies are the “IBMs” of the field (Use the questionnaire to guide your research when appropriate - Carol will select specific relevant questions)==
==Navigation==
[[Category:Diagnostic_Kits]]
[[Main Page]]
[[Diagnostic_Kits]]

Revision as of 10:39, 3 September 2009

What are the 5 top Universities in this field?

Correlate them with their main outputs (Data, Narratives, Tools)

Understand and identify cases where these universities are “experimenting” or “adopting” commons-based approaches. Are they adopting OA policies, for instance? Are they adopting Socially Responsible License approaches?

Identify these cases and treat them as entities that will also be placed in our mapping device (the quadrants)

Identify what universities are the “Microsofts” of the field and what companies are the “IBMs” of the field (Use the questionnaire to guide your research when appropriate - Carol will select specific relevant questions)

Navigation

Main Page Diagnostic_Kits