The Internet: Issues at the Frontiers - Revision history

BerkmanSysop: Protected "The Internet: Issues at the Frontiers" [edit=sysop:move=sysop]

2010-06-17T15:15:27Z

Protected "The Internet: Issues at the Frontiers" [edit=sysop:move=sysop]

← Older revision	Revision as of 15:15, 17 June 2010
(No difference)

BerkmanSysop at 15:15, 17 June 2010

2010-06-17T15:15:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:15, 17 June 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Moved to http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/iif/Main_Page		Moved to http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/iif/Main_Page
	~~[http://revizyonileorganizematbaacilikbrnckvvtmllttrhaberi.barisdemir.net revizyon ile organize matbaacılık brnckvvtmllttrhaberi]~~
	*[http://revizyonileorganizematbaacilikbrnckvvtmllttrhaberi.barisdemir.net/tag/revizyon-ile-organize-matbaacilik-brnckvvtmllttrhaberi revizyon ile organize matbaacılık brnckvvtmllttrhaberi]
	~~[http://www.gangstahomie.com gangstahomie]~~
	~~[http://www.trgala.com trgala]~~
	~~[http://www.ideico.net ideico]~~

Tak0o at 11:10, 22 February 2010

2010-02-22T11:10:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:10, 22 February 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Moved to http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/iif/Main_Page		Moved to http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/iif/Main_Page
			[http://revizyonileorganizematbaacilikbrnckvvtmllttrhaberi.barisdemir.net revizyon ile organize matbaacılık brnckvvtmllttrhaberi]
			*[http://revizyonileorganizematbaacilikbrnckvvtmllttrhaberi.barisdemir.net/tag/revizyon-ile-organize-matbaacilik-brnckvvtmllttrhaberi revizyon ile organize matbaacılık brnckvvtmllttrhaberi]
			[http://www.gangstahomie.com gangstahomie]
			[http://www.trgala.com trgala]
			[http://www.ideico.net ideico]

18.85.49.139: Replacing page with 'Moved to http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/iif/Main_Page'

2008-11-10T21:27:43Z

Replacing page with 'Moved to http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/iif/Main_Page'

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:27, 10 November 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~== Tools ==~~		Moved to http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/iif/Main_Page

	Canvassing the various tools out there for Internet-assisted debate and discourse. Could be anything from a Facebook group, or Mind Manager mapper... still in the formative/brainstorming stage, please add. [[User:Mchua\|Mchua]]

	~~=== Specific tools ===~~

	* http://www.debategraph.com - lets people map out arguments
	* http://am-crt.amthinking.net/crt/berkman/login.php
	* [http://~~gregdek.livejournal~~.~~com/29289~~.~~html lingobot] by gregdek - realtime irc translation via google translate~~
	* [http://gobby.0x539.de/trac/ gobby] - great for transcriptions (used in Wikimania '06)
	* http://thinkature.~~com~~/
	* http:/~~/vyew.com~~

	~~=== General classes of tools ===~~

	* chat/IM (many-to-many, many-to-one, one-to-one, private backchannels, discussion bots - we use a triagebot to keep some software dev discussions on track at OLPC - how privacy/logging of conversations affects what people say)
	* wikis (how various features affect the type of discourse/usage)
	* mailing lists (interesting: how their usage changes when they're bidirectionally synced with forums - this happened at OLPC)
	* forums (see above on mailing lists)
	* videoconferencing
	* virtual layers atop physical spaces (for instance: one of the most fun presentations I've ever done was when I made my vyew slides live-editable by the audience during the talk ... [[User:Mchua\|Mchua]])
	* translating services (see gregdek's lingobot, above)
	* relay services for the disabled (example: deaf person types or signs via webcam to interpreter who speaks into a telephone, listens for response, then signs/types back)
	* audio layers on top of online games - talking with your World of Warcraft team during a strike, etc.

	~~== Topics ==~~

	~~=== Anonymity ===~~

	"on the internet, nobody knows that you're a dog." Or tall, or 12 years old, or a hairdresser by day, or a lesbian, or in India, or with a harelip, or... but also: now that we can't filter by that by default, what do we filter by? Do we now bias towards good writers - and what of people who communicate best non-verbally?

	~~=== Sources ===~~

	Where does the information for/during discussions come from? Interfaces/ease-of-access/digestibility of information affects how quickly it can get injected into conversations? (examples: hitting wikipedia in the middle of a dinner discussion, calling an expert friend or hitting another IRC channel to answer a quick question, etc). How does this affect how people prepare for conversations? (If you can easily look up notes during the meeting, why take them down beforehand?) Trying to apply some thoughts about [http://blog.melchua.com/2006/03/31/on-the-future-of-libraries-2/ info access in libraries] to this.

	~~=== Identity and expertise ===~~

	How are participants in an internet dialog identified and credentialed? What gives weight to a participants' arguments - or phrased another way, what type of participants and arguments have weight, and what determines this for each discussion, participant, and discussion point?

	~~=== Socio-technical gap ===~~

	Problems encountered in the act of discoursing itself are sometimes addressed via social means, technological means, or both. It has been suggested that technological tools should support social processes, but there is an adaptation of each realm to the other - how does this back-and-forth take place in the design of a successful technology-enabled discussion?

	~~=== Other ===~~

	* Deliberative polling literature
	* Habermas
	* Dryzek
	* Jane Macoubrie
	* Deliberation Day

96.237.134.110: /* Topics */

2008-10-14T02:59:23Z

Topics

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:59, 14 October 2008
Line 33:		Line 33:

	Where does the information for/during discussions come from? Interfaces/ease-of-access/digestibility of information affects how quickly it can get injected into conversations? (examples: hitting wikipedia in the middle of a dinner discussion, calling an expert friend or hitting another IRC channel to answer a quick question, etc). How does this affect how people prepare for conversations? (If you can easily look up notes during the meeting, why take them down beforehand?) Trying to apply some thoughts about [http://blog.melchua.com/2006/03/31/on-the-future-of-libraries-2/ info access in libraries] to this.		Where does the information for/during discussions come from? Interfaces/ease-of-access/digestibility of information affects how quickly it can get injected into conversations? (examples: hitting wikipedia in the middle of a dinner discussion, calling an expert friend or hitting another IRC channel to answer a quick question, etc). How does this affect how people prepare for conversations? (If you can easily look up notes during the meeting, why take them down beforehand?) Trying to apply some thoughts about [http://blog.melchua.com/2006/03/31/on-the-future-of-libraries-2/ info access in libraries] to this.

			=== Identity and expertise ===

			How are participants in an internet dialog identified and credentialed? What gives weight to a participants' arguments - or phrased another way, what type of participants and arguments have weight, and what determines this for each discussion, participant, and discussion point?

			=== Socio-technical gap ===

			Problems encountered in the act of discoursing itself are sometimes addressed via social means, technological means, or both. It has been suggested that technological tools should support social processes, but there is an adaptation of each realm to the other - how does this back-and-forth take place in the design of a successful technology-enabled discussion?

	=== Other ===		=== Other ===

	Deliberative polling literature, Habermas~~, something from~~ Dryzek, Jane Macoubrie~~,Cass's~~ Deliberation Day ~~roundup.~~		* Deliberative polling literature
			* Habermas
			* Dryzek
			* Jane Macoubrie
			* Deliberation Day

Mchua at 01:48, 14 October 2008

2008-10-14T01:48:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:48, 14 October 2008
Line 24:		Line 24:
	* audio layers on top of online games - talking with your World of Warcraft team during a strike, etc.		* audio layers on top of online games - talking with your World of Warcraft team during a strike, etc.

	== ~~Ideas to discuss~~ ==		== Topics ==

	* anonymity - "on the internet, nobody knows that you're a dog." Or tall, or 12 years old, or a hairdresser by day, or a lesbian, or in India, or with a harelip, or... but also: now that we can't filter by that by default, what do we filter by? Do we now bias towards good writers - and what of people who communicate best non-verbally?		=== Anonymity ===
	* Where does the information for/during discussions come from? Interfaces/ease-of-access/digestibility of information affects how quickly it can get injected into conversations? (examples: hitting wikipedia in the middle of a dinner discussion, calling an expert friend or hitting another IRC channel to answer a quick question, etc). How does this affect how people prepare for conversations? (If you can easily look up notes during the meeting, why take them down beforehand?) Trying to apply some thoughts about [http://blog.melchua.com/2006/03/31/on-the-future-of-libraries-2/ info access in libraries] to this.
			"on the internet, nobody knows that you're a dog." Or tall, or 12 years old, or a hairdresser by day, or a lesbian, or in India, or with a harelip, or... but also: now that we can't filter by that by default, what do we filter by? Do we now bias towards good writers - and what of people who communicate best non-verbally?

			=== Sources ===

			Where does the information for/during discussions come from? Interfaces/ease-of-access/digestibility of information affects how quickly it can get injected into conversations? (examples: hitting wikipedia in the middle of a dinner discussion, calling an expert friend or hitting another IRC channel to answer a quick question, etc). How does this affect how people prepare for conversations? (If you can easily look up notes during the meeting, why take them down beforehand?) Trying to apply some thoughts about [http://blog.melchua.com/2006/03/31/on-the-future-of-libraries-2/ info access in libraries] to this.

			=== Other ===

			Deliberative polling literature, Habermas, something from Dryzek, Jane Macoubrie,Cass's Deliberation Day roundup.

18.85.47.122: /* Tools */

2008-10-10T01:45:17Z

Tools

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:45, 10 October 2008
Line 10:		Line 10:
	* [http://gobby.0x539.de/trac/ gobby] - great for transcriptions (used in Wikimania '06)		* [http://gobby.0x539.de/trac/ gobby] - great for transcriptions (used in Wikimania '06)
	* http://thinkature.com/		* http://thinkature.com/
			* http://vyew.com

	=== General classes of tools ===		=== General classes of tools ===
Line 18:		Line 19:
	* forums (see above on mailing lists)		* forums (see above on mailing lists)
	* videoconferencing		* videoconferencing
	* virtual layers atop physical spaces (for instance: one of the most fun presentations I've ever done was when I made my slides live-editable by the audience during the talk ~~- trying to find the tool I used to do that~~... [[User:Mchua\|Mchua]])		* virtual layers atop physical spaces (for instance: one of the most fun presentations I've ever done was when I made my vyew slides live-editable by the audience during the talk ... [[User:Mchua\|Mchua]])
	* translating services (see gregdek's lingobot, above)		* translating services (see gregdek's lingobot, above)
	* relay services for the disabled (example: deaf person types or signs via webcam to interpreter who speaks into a telephone, listens for response, then signs/types back)		* relay services for the disabled (example: deaf person types or signs via webcam to interpreter who speaks into a telephone, listens for response, then signs/types back)

Mchua at 16:52, 9 October 2008

2008-10-09T16:52:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:52, 9 October 2008
Line 22:		Line 22:
	* relay services for the disabled (example: deaf person types or signs via webcam to interpreter who speaks into a telephone, listens for response, then signs/types back)		* relay services for the disabled (example: deaf person types or signs via webcam to interpreter who speaks into a telephone, listens for response, then signs/types back)
	* audio layers on top of online games - talking with your World of Warcraft team during a strike, etc.		* audio layers on top of online games - talking with your World of Warcraft team during a strike, etc.

			== Ideas to discuss ==

			* anonymity - "on the internet, nobody knows that you're a dog." Or tall, or 12 years old, or a hairdresser by day, or a lesbian, or in India, or with a harelip, or... but also: now that we can't filter by that by default, what do we filter by? Do we now bias towards good writers - and what of people who communicate best non-verbally?
			* Where does the information for/during discussions come from? Interfaces/ease-of-access/digestibility of information affects how quickly it can get injected into conversations? (examples: hitting wikipedia in the middle of a dinner discussion, calling an expert friend or hitting another IRC channel to answer a quick question, etc). How does this affect how people prepare for conversations? (If you can easily look up notes during the meeting, why take them down beforehand?) Trying to apply some thoughts about [http://blog.melchua.com/2006/03/31/on-the-future-of-libraries-2/ info access in libraries] to this.

Mchua: New page: == Tools == Canvassing the various tools out there for Internet-assisted debate and discourse. Could be anything from a Facebook group, or Mind Manager mapper... still in the formative/br...

2008-10-09T16:22:06Z

New page: == Tools == Canvassing the various tools out there for Internet-assisted debate and discourse. Could be anything from a Facebook group, or Mind Manager mapper... still in the formative/br...

New page

== Tools ==

Canvassing the various tools out there for Internet-assisted debate and discourse. Could be anything from a Facebook group, or Mind Manager mapper... still in the formative/brainstorming stage, please add. [[User:Mchua|Mchua]]

=== Specific tools ===

* http://www.debategraph.com - lets people map out arguments
* http://am-crt.amthinking.net/crt/berkman/login.php
* [http://gregdek.livejournal.com/29289.html lingobot] by gregdek - realtime irc translation via google translate
* [http://gobby.0x539.de/trac/ gobby] - great for transcriptions (used in Wikimania '06)
* http://thinkature.com/

=== General classes of tools ===

* chat/IM (many-to-many, many-to-one, one-to-one, private backchannels, discussion bots - we use a triagebot to keep some software dev discussions on track at OLPC - how privacy/logging of conversations affects what people say)
* wikis (how various features affect the type of discourse/usage)
* mailing lists (interesting: how their usage changes when they're bidirectionally synced with forums - this happened at OLPC)
* forums (see above on mailing lists)
* videoconferencing
* virtual layers atop physical spaces (for instance: one of the most fun presentations I've ever done was when I made my slides live-editable by the audience during the talk - trying to find the tool I used to do that... [[User:Mchua|Mchua]])
* translating services (see gregdek's lingobot, above)
* relay services for the disabled (example: deaf person types or signs via webcam to interpreter who speaks into a telephone, listens for response, then signs/types back)
* audio layers on top of online games - talking with your World of Warcraft team during a strike, etc.