|
Open Economies - Need for a standard set of specifications for recycled computers
Mailing List Home
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Need for a standard set of specifications for recycled computers
- To: openeconomies(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Need for a standard set of specifications for recycled computers
- From: Richard Curtain <curtain(at)bigpond.net.au>
- Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 08:19:42 +1000
- Organization: Curtain Consulting, Melbourne
- Reply-to: Curtain <curtain(at)bigpond.net.au>
Request to the Open Economies List
I have recently participated in the Youth Employment Summit in Alexandria
Egypt where youth delegates from 140 countries participated along with 40
ministerial delegations.
My input was a paper on the ICT to generate employment opportunities for
young people in low and middle income countries. I was also able to present
the paper at a well attended seminar at the Asia Pacific Development Centre
in Kuala Lumpur on my way to the conference.
One issue that came up was a concern from young people that the high income
countries are dumping their old computers in the low income countries.
Clearly, there is a need for someone to specify a minimum standard for old
computers which links processor speed with the required RAM to the
requirements of an open source operating system and open source office
applications, and other free software such as an e-mail program.
There may also be a requirement to specify a refurbishment standard - what
items of hardware need to be checked and in some way assessed in terms of
their reliability.
Ongoing maintenance requirements also needs to be spelt out so that people
in low income countries seeking recycled computers are aware of their
lifetime maintenance costs.
Is there scope for an authoritative body to put some effort into this to
address the potential resistance that could develop to the use of a
potentially valuable source of low cost access to computers. There is a risk
involved in using recycled computers and it is reasonable to assume that a
risk assessment should be provided as an expression of good faith that this
is seen by the recipients as a genuine offer of a valuable resource and
therefore is not seen as dumping.
There is also a need to specify what ways that e-mail can be used more
effectively to communicate. Most of the delegates I had contact with used
hotmail or yahoo accounts. However this is a poor way of using e-mail on an
ongoing basis.
Richard Curtain
curtain@bigpond.net.au
|