[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] (Fwd) Senator Boxer On Computer Privacy
- To: "Richard Hartman" <hartman(at)onetouch.com>, dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu, owner-dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] (Fwd) Senator Boxer On Computer Privacy
- From: microlenz(at)earthlink.net
- Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 18:25:28 -0800
- In-reply-to: <255195E927D0B74AB08F4DCB07181B904C58D0@exchsj1.onetouch.com>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
On 23 Mar 2004 at 11:32, Richard Hartman wrote:
Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] (Fwd) Senator Boxer On Computer Privacy
Date sent: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:32:31 -0800
From: "Richard Hartman" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Send reply to: email@example.com
> If she is so concerned about privacy issues, I wonder
> what her stand on this one is:
> California Assembly Bill 2735 and Senate Bill 1506 would require anyone who
> knowingly disseminates commercial recorded or audiovisual material over the
> Internet to mark it with his or her name and address or face a possible one-year
> prison sentence. [/blockquote]
> (The above information came from a 321studios mailing list.)
Links at eff too.
* CA Alert: Hollywood Attacks Your Privacy Again!
The California legislature is considering a pair of bills that
would require anyone who knowingly disseminates copyrighted
material over the Net to mark it with his or her a name and
address. We've got two questions: 1) Do we really want to send
teenagers to state prison for a year if they share even part
of a single song without stating their name and address? And 2)
Is it really a good idea to force everyone - including children -
to put their real names and addresses on files they trade?
With Internet spamming, stalking and identity theft at an
all-time high, this "forced disclosure" law will do far more
harm than good. The proposed law is supposed to stop piracy,
but it may be the most ineffective, harmful method yet proposed.
Tell your state representatives that this legislation is
a bad idea.
Make your voice heard with the Action Center:
> -Richard M. Hartman
> 186,000 mi/sec: not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]
> > Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 7:15 PM
> > To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> > Subject: [dvd-discuss] (Fwd) Senator Boxer On Computer Privacy
> > It would be nice if she included a URL to the bill too....
> > ------- Forwarded message follows -------
> > From: "U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer"
> > <BulletinFeedback@boxer.senate.gov>
> > To: "email@example.com"
> > <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > Subject: Senator Boxer On Computer Privacy
> > Date sent: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 06:13:52 -0800
> > I thought you would be interested in the following message.
> > ===================================================
> > Dear Friend:
> > I recently joined my colleagues, U.S. Senators Ron Wyden
> > (D-Ore.) and Conrad Burns (R-Mont.) in introducing legislation
> > to better protect the privacy of American computer users. Our
> > bill would prohibit spyware, adware, and other invasive
> > software from being secretly installed on Americans' computers.
> > Our SPYBLOCK (Software Principles Yielding Better Levels of
> > Consumer Knowledge) Act would prohibit installing software on
> > somebody else's computer without notice and consent, and
> > requires reasonable "uninstall" procedures for all downloadable
> > software. Spyware, adware and other hidden programs often
> > secretly piggyback on downloaded Internet software without the
> > user's knowledge, transmitting information about computer usage
> > and generating pop-up advertisements. Frequently such software
> > is designed to be virtually impossible to uninstall.
> > This legislation will give consumers control over the programs
> > that are downloaded onto their computers. As more and more
> > people use the Internet, privacy violations become a greater
> > threat, and we want to give computer users the power to protect
> > themselves from spyware and other hazardous software.
> > The bill also prohibits programs designed to trick users about
> > who is responsible for content a user sees, such as causing a
> > counterfeit replica of a company's Web site to appear whenever
> > the consumer attempts to navigate toward a legitimate company's
> > Web site. These types of programs have been used to
> > fraudulently obtain personal financial information from users
> > confused by dummy Web sites.
> > The bill would be enforced by the Federal Trade Commission
> > (FTC) and state attorneys general. The FTC could impose
> > penalties just as it does for unfair and deceptive practices,
> > including cease-and-desist orders and civil fines. State
> > attorneys general could bring suits seeking injunctions, plus
> > damages or other relief.
> > People who use computers need to have a better sense that their
> > private information and their computers are protected. Our
> > bill aims to do just that. If you have any questions or
> > comments about this or any other federal matter, I invite you
> > to contact me at http://boxer.senate.gov/contact/webform.cfm .
> > Sincerely,
> > Barbara Boxer
> > United States Senator
> > ===================================================
> > For more information on Senator Boxer's record and other
> > information, please go to: http://boxer.senate.gov
> > If you would like to make a comment regarding this or any other
> > federal matter, please feel free to do so at:
> > http://boxer.senate.gov/contact/webform.cfm
> > If this message reached you in error, or if you would like to
> > cancel your subscription, please reply to this message with
> > unsubscribe in the subject line.
> > ------- End of forwarded message -------