[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [dvd-discuss] EFF: Court Endorses Ban on DVD Copy Technology[321 Studios]

On 02/23/04 at 18:22, 'twas brillig and microlenz@earthlink.net scrobe:
> > http://www.eff.org/IP/DMCA/MGM_v_321Studios/20040219_Order.pdf
> > 
> > Read it and weep, folks. In the Order, every single geek argument is
> > slammed, and slammed *hard*. In particular:
> > 
> > "This Court finds, as did both the Corley and Elcom courts, that legal
> > downstream use of the copyrighted material by customers is not a defense
> > to the software manufacturer's violation of the provisions of - 1201 (b)(1)."
> > 
> > Fair Use is no defense to the DMCA tools provision, sayeth the Court.]

	The opinion cites Corley (272 F.3d at 444) and says "This
Court agrees with the Corley court that the purchase of a DVD does not
give to the purchaser the authority of the copyright holder to decrypt

	Does the court still not realize that decryption is necessary
in order to view?

A. I have purchased a DVD. 
B. I have purchased licensed DVD player hardware.
C. I have signed no license agreement with the DVDCCA.
D. In order to view the content on the DVD, it must somehow be

Decryption does not occur magically; it is performed by my computer at
my instruction. The computer is a proxy for my action, not an actor
itself. If, as the court opines, the combination of (A & B) does not
confer *upon me* the "authority of the copyright holder" which is
required to decrypt, and furthermore given (C); how am I legally clear
of the DMCA when (D) occurs as I play my DVD?

	Have I missed a court opinion somewhere along the line that
explains this?

Ole Craig * UNIX, linux, SMTP-ninja; news, web; SGI martyr * CS Computing
Facility, UMass * <www.cs.umass.edu/~olc/pgppubkey.txt> for public key

  Where are the missing deficit-reduction program-related activities?