[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Gedanken Experiment -Unix and Norton
- To: dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Gedanken Experiment -Unix and Norton
- From: microlenz(at)earthlink.net
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 19:18:30 -0700
- In-reply-to: <3F134167.5487C0A4@ia.nsc.com>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
On 14 Jul 2003 at 17:48, John Zulauf wrote:
Date sent: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 17:48:55 -0600
From: "John Zulauf" <johnzu@ia.nsc.com>
To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Gedanken Experiment -Unix and Norton
Send reply to: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
>
>
> Michael A Rolenz wrote:
>
>
> > You will get no argument that we are providing TOO much protection to
> > TOO much things.
>
> Clearly, and we have over worked and under paid patent examiners
> overloaded with "application" and "business process" patents.
>
> > If the protection is to further progress, then
> > that is content neutral
>
> And thus certain classes of inventions shouldn't be singled out because
> of their content or form or expression. ;-)
Or that the want the protection
>
> .002
>