[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Circumvention Device Definition
- To: dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Circumvention Device Definition
- From: microlenz(at)earthlink.net
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 18:41:43 -0700
- In-reply-to: <20030617100642.GA26456@sethf.com>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
On 17 Jun 2003 at 6:06, Seth Finkelstein wrote:
Date sent: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 06:06:42 -0400
From: Seth Finkelstein <sethf@sethf.com>
To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
Subject: [dvd-discuss] Circumvention Device Definition
Send reply to: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> Much as it's fun to proclaim "Magic Markers Are A
> Circumvention Device" (and Therefore The DMCA Is Absurd), let's
> not forget the technical definition in the law does take that
> issue into account:
>
> * (A) is primarily designed or produced for the purpose of
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> circumventing protection afforded by a technological measure that
> effectively protects a right of a copyright owner under this
> title in a work or a portion thereof;
> * (B) has only limited commercially significant purpose or use
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> other than to circumvent protection afforded by a technological
> measure that effectively protects a right of a copyright owner
> under this title in a work or a portion thereof; or
> * (C) is marketed by that person or another acting in concert
> with that person with that person's knowledge for use in
> circumventing protection afforded by a technological measure that
> effectively protects a right of a copyright owner under this
> title in a work or a portion thereof.
>
> I must admit I've wondered about that part (C) - "marketed".
> It does seem to me to arguably cover e.g. an eBay auction that says
> "Magic Markers - great for circumventing CD copying restrictions".
> hat's odd to my techie-mindset. But it actually seems to fit the legal
> framework around earlier infringement-capable devices (i.e., you can
> in general sell a device that has an infringing use, but marketing it
> for the explicit purpose of infringement is a no-no).
OK so what about sending out an email or flyers that say "you can create a
circumvention device by doing the following ... [and several butcher's aprons
later]...and that is how it can be done"?
>
> --
> Seth Finkelstein Consulting Programmer sethf@sethf.com http://sethf.com
> Anticensorware Investigations - http://sethf.com/anticensorware/
> Seth Finkelstein's Infothought blog - http://sethf.com/infothought/blog/