[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [dvd-discuss]Lexmark Decision

On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 08:00:43AM -0800, Michael A Rolenz wrote:
> Lexmark not only chose to write a volumous reply (28pages) but send this 
> court decision double in size to the LOC saying 
> "THe courts have decided so the legislature should keep their hands 
> off"... remember that the USSC said the opposite in Eldred.

Have I missed the final decision here? I thought the court had only issued a
preliminary injunction so far.

> http://www.copyright.gov/1201/2003/reply/328a.pdf

My (possibly somewhat old) version of acroread claims to be "unable to
decrypt" this file.


"There has to be a media outlet thats not run by corporations that build
 a drum beat for war, corporations that profit from militarism and war,
 but run by journalists and artists." (Lou Hill, Pacifica Radio founder)