[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[dvd-discuss] Privatization of Copyright (A Modest Proposal) (wasHackingrequires search warrant -- ruling)
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: [dvd-discuss] Privatization of Copyright (A Modest Proposal) (wasHackingrequires search warrant -- ruling)
- From: microlenz(at)earthlink.net
- Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 17:31:56 -0800
- In-reply-to: <3DD938A6.9070404@xinetd.com>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Glendon M. Gross" <gross@xinetd.com> wrote
It's almost as though the RIAA would become like a "Department of Art" or
"Department of Copyright Enforcement." ....along those lines...
The Privatization of Copyright - A Modest Proposal.
With the ideological direction of reducing the size of government comes the
requirement to reduce what it actually has to do. ONe successful approach has
been outsourcing. Fewer Federal Employees means more outside workers are hired
to do what had been government functions. Take copyright. Should the government
really even be involved in it? Upon reflection, one realizes that this is
probably the simplest thing for the government to outsource. Consider the
original copyright system in the USA. Works had to be stamped with copyright
notices giving the time of publication and registered with the Librarian of
COngress. The government is squarely interfering in the copyright process. So
to properly outsource copyright one must have a copyright system that does not
require the government. In the original copyright, nothing was copyrighted
unless it had a copyright notice. To outsource, the copyright notice will no
longer be required. Furthermore, registration of copyright also required
government interference. Eliminating that requirement will permit outsourcing.
To really spur the privatization of copyright there must be something for the
outsources to do. Obviously, the best thing for them to do is to have to spend
inordinate amounts of time researching copyright. The first thing that must be
done is to allow everything to be copyrighted. Next by eliminating the
requirement that the work even have a date of publication, even more research
is required. Set the term to be the lifetime of the author plus 50 years. That
way, even if you can determine who wrote the work, you probably can't find who
owns the copyright years after their death, their children's death, their
children's children or the death of the last collaborator or their children'd
death, or their children's children's death. So the really best way to
outsource this is simply to let the outsourcers be the holders of vast amounts
of copyright material already. That way they can get more and have a more
efficient time searching through all this. Now to really make this work, one
needs to really stretch the times the that holders of vast amounts of copyright
material, such as corporations, can keep track of what they have. ANswer,
increase it to life plus 70 years or 95 yrs for works for hire. That way the
creators, most of the ancestors, and nearly all the corporations will all be
gone and NOBODY will be able to figure it out. Now copyright can be outsourced
from the Government. The economy is enhanced by all this outsourcing. The
outsourcees can have perpetual employment. The sanctity of intellectual
property rights can be preserved unto the fifth generation and total confusion
shall reign over the land causing a multitude of court cases.
Posted on the openlaw website at
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/twiki/bin/view/Openlaw/PrivitizationOfCopyright
feel free to add or enhance....the more outrageous the better. The Santa Anas
(reverse wind direction in LA coming off the desert) are starting to get to me
and I guess I'm a little cranky