[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Inexplicable
- To: DVD-Discuss <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Inexplicable
- From: "D. C. Sessions" <dcs(at)lumbercartel.com>
- Date: 16 Oct 2002 22:13:20 -0700
- In-reply-to: <3DADAEFA.30913.315C42@localhost>
- References: <3DADAEFA.30913.315C42@localhost>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 18:24, microlenz@earthlink.net wrote:
> OK....if anybody out of the USA knows the answer email it to me....but noone
> else. I don't want you to be accused of trafficking but a personal
> communication is guarded by the DMCA isn't it? Or not?
I don't see any exemption in the statute.
Trafficing is trafficing, whether retail
or wholesale.
> On 16 Oct 2002 at 8:04, D. C. Sessions wrote:
>
> Subject: [dvd-discuss] Inexplicable
> From: "D. C. Sessions" <dcs@lumbercartel.com>
> To: DVD-Discuss <dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu>
> Date sent: 16 Oct 2002 08:04:09 -0700
> Send reply to: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
>
> > Red Hat issues a kernel security patch, but due
> > to the DMCA can't explain why:
> >
> > http://www.theregus.com/content/4/26656.html
> >
> > --
> > | The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong. |
> > | Because the slow, feeble old codgers like me cheat. |
> > +--------------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> --------------+
> >
>
>
--
| The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong. |
| Because the slow, feeble old codgers like me cheat. |
+--------------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> --------------+