RE: [dvd-discuss] Copyright Office to Consider Anticircumvention Exemptions

["Michael A Rolenz" <Michael.A.Rolenz(at)aero.org>]

Good point Jim 

It's also a good source of what things they already considered and are 
looking for evidence. The "we see no evidence at this time" phrase gets 
overworked <salt rubbed in wound> but given Felton, Skylarov, AGFA, there 
may be enough evidence to start considering.




"James S. Tyre" <jstyre@jstyre.com>
Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
10/11/2002 01:17 PM
Please respond to dvd-discuss

 
        To:     <dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu>
        cc: 
        Subject:        RE: [dvd-discuss] Copyright Office to Consider Anticircumvention 
Exemptions


At 01:04 PM 10/11/2002 -0700, Richard Hartman wrote:
>Are the "classes" classes of works, or classes
>of circumstances?


Classes of works.

For those considering commenting, it would be helpful to review the 
results 
of the last rulemaking round, learn from it.
http://www.loc.gov/copyright/fedreg/65fr64555.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------
James S. Tyre                               mailto:jstyre@jstyre.com
Law Offices of James S. Tyre          310-839-4114/310-839-4602(fax)
10736 Jefferson Blvd., #512               Culver City, CA 90230-4969
Co-founder, The Censorware Project             http://censorware.net