[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Commentary on "Clean Flicks" case
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Commentary on "Clean Flicks" case
- From: "Michael A Rolenz" <Michael.A.Rolenz(at)aero.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 14:55:41 -0700
- Cc: "dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu" <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>, owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
At the end
Coming Next: Some silly things directors say.
so when will this be out? Ms. Coolidge had enough silly things to say!
Ernest Miller <ernest.miller@aya.yale.edu>
Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
09/27/2002 06:25 AM
Please respond to dvd-discuss
To: "dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu" <dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu>
cc:
Subject: [dvd-discuss] Commentary on "Clean Flicks" case
I've started an indepth and extensive series on the "Clean Flicks" case
dealing with post sale editing of works:
http://research.yale.edu/lawmeme/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=353