[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] ABA to Vote on Copyright Term Extension Resolution
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] ABA to Vote on Copyright Term Extension Resolution
- From: microlenz(at)earthlink.net
- Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 19:21:33 -0700
- In-reply-to: <3D126650.5E488462@RealMeasures.dyndns.org>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Haven't read the whole thing but this one stood out
"The Report rejected that Congress was stepping "down the road of perpetual
copyright protection" for three reasons: (1) the Patent and Copyright Clause
of the Constitution precludes such a result; (2) the "emerging international
standard" is a fixed term based on the author's death; and (3) the U.S.
principle of protecting the author and at least one generation of heirs
remained unchanged by the bill which simply recognized the life-plus-50 term as
insufficient to accomplish this goal."
We CAN NOT have perpetual copyright because it is forbidden therefore whatever
we do can not create a perpetual copyright.
On 20 Jun 2002 at 19:33, Seth Johnson wrote:
Date sent: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 19:33:36 -0400
From: Seth Johnson <seth.johnson@realmeasures.dyndns.org>
Organization: Real Measures
To: C-FIT_Community@realmeasures.dyndns.org,
C-FIT_Release_Community@realmeasures.dyndns.org,
dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu, DMCA_Discuss@lists.microshaft.org
Subject: [dvd-discuss] ABA to Vote on Copyright Term Extension
Resolution
Send reply to: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
>
> (Forwarded from NY Fair Use Discussion list,
> fairuse-discuss@mrbrklyn.com; originally from James Love's
> Random Bits list, random-bits@lists.essential.org)
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 16:00:39 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Jay Sulzberger <jays@panix.com>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 12:55:23 -0700 (PDT)
> From: YP Fun <ypinterest@yahoo.com>
>
>
> fyi:
>
> extension of IP copyrights from life+50 to life+70 in
> response to EU's +20 extension.
>
> >
> > --- James Love <james.love@cptech.org> wrote:
> > > From: James Love <james.love@cptech.org>
> > > Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 15:15:19 -0400
> > >
> > > -------- Original Message --------
> > > Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 11:13:37 -0400
> > > From: Donna Wentworth <donna@cyber.law.harvard.edu>
> > >
> > >
> > > In case you hadn't seen this...
> > >
> > >
> > > COPYRIGHT TERM EXTENSION ACT
> > > PROPOSED RESOLUTION 301-1
> > >
> > > http://www.abanet.org/intelprop/summer2002/307.doc
> > >
>
>
> YP
>
> =====
> Please Copy... Ideas deserve to be free.
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> "A billion hours ago, human life appeared on earth. A
> billion minutes ago, Christianity emerged. A billion seconds
> ago, the Beatles changed music. A billion Coca-Colas ago was
> yesterday morning."
> - Robert Goizueta, the late CEO of Coca-Cola, April 1997
>
> ____________________________
> New Yorkers for Fair Use -
> because it's either fair use or useless....
>