[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Eldred Amicus
- To: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Eldred Amicus
- From: Richard Hartman <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 08:41:23 -0700
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
It doesn't particularly. It was just a response to this:
> I'm sure I'm missing something. Could someone
> please point me to even *one* instance in the last
> two centuries -- why not, since the First Congress -- of
> an author whose work was a complete flop during the first
> 28 years and only then became seriously successful
--
-Richard M. Hartman
hartman@onetouch.com
186,000 mi./sec ... not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: D. C. Sessions [mailto:dcs@lumbercartel.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 9:06 PM
> To: DVD-Discuss
> Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Eldred Amicus
>
>
> On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 09:16, Richard Hartman wrote:
> > Dunno about authors, but it is not unusual
> > for artists to have to wait for a long time
> > (sometimes after death!) for their works to
> > become popular.
>
> I'm not sure how this relates to incentive to produce.
>
> --
> | May I have the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, |
> | the strength to change the things I cannot accept, and the |
> | cunning to hide the bodies of those who got in my way. |
> +------------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> -----------+
>
>