[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Eldred Amicus
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Eldred Amicus
- From: microlenz(at)earthlink.net
- Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 19:33:33 -0700
- In-reply-to: <20020603191437.B1039@inka.de>
- References: <E06ADA0073926048AD304115DD8AB6BC01239632@mail.onetouch.com>; from hartman@onetouch.com on Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 09:16:10AM -0700
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
You're forgetting the lithograph, serigraph and print markets. 100yrs ago the
first was the only media for mass produced works and had a very limited print
run but the latter two have become popular and the artist can have thousands
run off, inspected and signed. Personally, I don't consider a signed print as
being more than a curiosity and don't buy them but their value in the market
place depends upon who signed it.
On 3 Jun 2002 at 19:14, Sham Gardner wrote:
Date sent: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 19:14:38 +0200
From: Sham Gardner <mail@risctaker.inka.de>
To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Eldred Amicus
Send reply to: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 09:16:10AM -0700, Richard Hartman wrote:
> > Dunno about authors, but it is not unusual
> > for artists to have to wait for a long time
> > (sometimes after death!) for their works to
> > become popular.
>
> However in all of those cases I'm aware of, the finanancial profit from that
> popularity has been the result of selling the original works rather than copies
> of them.
>
> --
> http://sites.inka.de/risctaker/DeCSS/
>
> "Any time you skip a commercial [...] you're actually stealing the
> programming." (James Kellner, CEO Turner Broadcasting)