Re: [dvd-discuss] Eldred Amicus

["Michael A Rolenz" <Michael.A.Rolenz(at)aero.org>]

It would be nice if we could get them to dole out penalties for inflated 
earnings and flakey accounting too.




Ron Gustavson <rongusss@attbi.com>
Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
05/30/2002 07:51 PM
Please respond to dvd-discuss

 
        To:     dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
        cc: 
        Subject:        Re: [dvd-discuss] Eldred Amicus


On Thu, 30 May 2002 08:53:20 -0700, "Michael A Rolenz"
<Michael.A.Rolenz@aero.org> wrote:

>I agree with you there. The problem is that by calling copyright, patent, 

>trademark "INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY" rather than "holding a CPT", a lot of 
>people have begun to think that they have the attributes of real and 
>personal property which it does not. Possession of a CPT does not mean 
>that you and your heirs hold the rights to it ad infinitum. That's why 
the 
>silver tongued Jack is so persuasive in COngres.
>IN some sense anytime somebody debates this and uses the phrase 
>"intellectual property" or lets their opponent use it unchallenged they 
>lose the debate.

With Hollywood's emphasis on options--a six year option on someone's
life story; a three year option on a new play--perhaps the SEC is a more
appropriate arbiter of IP rights than the LOC.


______________NO-&infin;-DO_____________
7607 6FA2 6485 3707  42D1 99AD 7E20 52FD