[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Eldred Amicus
- To: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Eldred Amicus
- From: Richard Hartman <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 09:13:33 -0700
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Seth Johnson [mailto:seth.johnson@realmeasures.dyndns.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 6:05 PM
> To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Eldred Amicus
>
>
>
> Michael:
>
> So you have a good, useful definition of the idea/expression
> dichotomy?
>
Gone With The Wind / The Wind Done Gone
_very_ different expression of the same events.
--
-Richard M. Hartman
hartman@onetouch.com
186,000 mi./sec ... not just a good idea, it's the LAW!