[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Eldred Amicus
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Eldred Amicus
- From: Kurt Hockenbury <khockenb(at)stevens-tech.edu>
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 11:55:58 -0400
- In-reply-to: <3CF57681.1020908@aya.yale.edu>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
On Wed, 29 May 2002, Ernest Miller wrote:
> This reminds me of the idea of a tax. If copyright is property, then it
> should be subject to a property tax, right? One of the reasons we tax
> property is to encourage its use. We don't want property to stand idle.
> Same goes for copyrighted works. If you are still using it, you pay a
> tax, and can afford it. If you choose not to pay a tax, it goes into
> the public domain.
Interesting.
If the publishing industry insists on calling distribution of copies as
"piracy", I have made the suggestion that duplication of unavailable works be
referred to as "salvage".
So when someone digitizes a 30 year old, never re-released vinyl album and
makes it available, they are engaged in a "salvage operation of intellectual
property".
See also "abandonware".
What other odd ideas can we pull out of the "property" metaphor?