[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Eldred Amicus
- To: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Eldred Amicus
- From: Richard Hartman <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 09:01:13 -0700
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Richards [mailto:kyhwana@world-net.co.nz]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 7:30 AM
> To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Eldred Amicus
>
>
> On Wed, 29 May 2002 12:48:52 +0200
> "someone somewhere" <chaos755@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > just ask yourself, how many movies older than 15 years do
> you watch, there
> > may be some, but the select few that still make some money
> out of it, can't
> > possibly justify such a lenghty term...
> One word, Disney.
>
>
You can do better than that:
Casablanca
His Girl Friday
Notorious
Gone With The Wind
heck, I personally like Harold Lloyd movies
(TCM just had a marathon of them last night!)
... and if you don't want to go that far back,
how about a little movie called "Star Wars"?
Don't ask how many movies older than 15 years
I watch ... it's a much shorter list if you ask
how many movies _newer_ than 15 years I watch.
Most of 'em these days aren't worth my time.
--
-Richard M. Hartman
hartman@onetouch.com
186,000 mi./sec ... not just a good idea, it's the LAW!