[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Eldred Amicus
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Eldred Amicus
- From: "Steve Hosgood" <steve(at)caederus.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 10:25:24 +0100
- In-reply-to: <3CF448E1.8AC4FA8F@swbell.net>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Jolley <tjolley@swbell.net> wrote:
> The answer for an upper limit could be in the constitution.
> ...by securing for limited Times to Authors...
> Anything granted beyond an author's lifetime
> is being granted to someone else.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
That's the neatest observation I've seen for a while! There must be some way
to draw the court's attention to it.
--
Steve Hosgood |
steve@caederus.com | "A good plan today is better
Phone: +44 1792 203707 + ask for Steve | than a perfect plan tomorrow"
Fax: +44 70922 70944 | - Conrad Brean
--------------------------------------------+
http://tallyho.bc.nu/~steve | ( from the film "Wag the Dog" )