[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Senate Judiciary Report on content protection - WHAT do thoseguys drink/smoke/shoot/snort....?
- To: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Senate Judiciary Report on content protection - WHAT do thoseguys drink/smoke/shoot/snort....?
- From: "Ballowe, Charles" <CBallowe(at)usg.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 17:05:59 -0500
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Just as a note, it is an MPAA report to the senate judiciary committee,
not one generated by the senate. Not that the senate doesn't buy it
hook, line, and sinker, but I won't blame them for the origin.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael A Rolenz [mailto:Michael.A.Rolenz@aero.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 4:57 PM
> To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> Subject: [dvd-discuss] Senate Judiciary Report on content protection -
> WHAT do thoseguys drink/smoke/shoot/snort....?
>
>
> From
>
> http://judiciary.senate.gov/special/content_protection.pdf
>
> Status: Watermark Detection and Response in A/D Converters
> As noted, the selection of a watermark is only the first step
> in plugging
> the analog hole. Subsequently, a cross-industry forum must be
> created or
> chosen in determining how and under what compliance framework
> watermark
> detection and response would take place in A/D converters.
>
> What hydrocephalic came up with this one?
>