[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Comparing DeCSS with legitimate code.
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Comparing DeCSS with legitimate code.
- From: Tom <tom(at)lemuria.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 08:17:56 +0200
- In-reply-to: <3CED7315.7060008@dial.pipex.com>; from maroberts@dial.pipex.com on Thu, May 23, 2002 at 11:54:13PM +0100
- References: <3CED7315.7060008@dial.pipex.com>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 11:54:13PM +0100, Mark Roberts wrote:
> exists. Has it been pointed out to the court that every legitimate DVD
> player in the world has code which performs exactly the same function as
> DeCSS ?
that is not true. especially later versions of decss have a much more
sophisticated key handling than the commercial dvd players.
> Unless the court can say what DeCSS does that a legitimate player does
> not, there is surely no way that it can be ruled illegal.
let's see:
- decss reads DVDs regardless of region coding
- decss allows skipping of the FBI warning
- decss reads DVDs regardless of key revocation (later versions)
- decss doesn't even need a key (later versions)
--
New GPG Key issued (old key expired):
http://web.lemuria.org/pubkey.html
pub 1024D/2D7A04F5 2002-05-16 Tom Vogt <tom@lemuria.org>
Key fingerprint = C731 64D1 4BCF 4C20 48A4 29B2 BF01 9FA1 2D7A 04F5