[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] A good use of circumvention
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] A good use of circumvention
- From: mickey <mickeym(at)mindspring.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 15:43:58 -0400
- References: <LPBBIBPCDBCNNDNJHGNLGEGBCDAA.columbmt@notes.udayton.edu>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2.1) Gecko/20010901
I understood the article to say that a news reporting agency made use of
circumvention.
Mickey
Michael Columbus wrote:
>No offense but it seems your arguing for the sake of arguing. Government
>officials and law enforcement are exempt from recourse for 1201(a) or (b)
>circumventions. So someone can make that arguement but unless the opposing
>lawyer has already been disbarred he'd better not lose.
>
>1201(e) Law enforcement, intelligence, and other government activities.
>This section does not prohibit any lawfully authorized investigative,
>protective, information security, or intelligence activity of an officer,
>agent, or employee of the United States, a State, or a political subdivision
>of a State, or a person acting pursuant to a contract with the United
>States, a State, or a political subdivision of a State. For purposes of this
>subsection, the term "information security" means activities carried out in
>order to identify and address the vulnerabilities of a government computer,
>computer system, or computer network.
>
>
>Michael Columbus
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
>[mailto:owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu]On Behalf Of
>microlenz@earthlink.net
>Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 12:00 AM
>To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
>Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] A good use of circumvention
>
>
>Quite right....afterall the santity of intellectual property must be
>preserved
>now that Osama can invoke the DMCA to claim circumvention of his
>intellectual
>property...the sad thing is that I can imagine somebody actually making that
>argument.
>
>On 20 May 2002 at 23:02, mickey wrote:
>
>Date sent: Mon, 20 May 2002 23:02:05 -0400
>From: mickey <mickeym@mindspring.com>
>To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
>Subject: [dvd-discuss] A good use of circumvention
>Send reply to: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
>
>> From "http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,53157,00.html", about a new
>>bin Laden video:
>>
>>"He said the film was on a CD-ROM, which the reporter brought to Britain
>>10 days ago. The CD-ROM contained a password, which the agency managed
>>to unlock last week."
>>
>>It kinda stinks that we couldn't do that in the US.
>>
>>mickeym
>>
>>
>
>
>