[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] A good use of circumvention
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] A good use of circumvention
- From: microlenz(at)earthlink.net
- Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 21:00:12 -0700
- In-reply-to: <3CE9B8AD.6070803@mindspring.com>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Quite right....afterall the santity of intellectual property must be preserved
now that Osama can invoke the DMCA to claim circumvention of his intellectual
property...the sad thing is that I can imagine somebody actually making that
argument.
On 20 May 2002 at 23:02, mickey wrote:
Date sent: Mon, 20 May 2002 23:02:05 -0400
From: mickey <mickeym@mindspring.com>
To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
Subject: [dvd-discuss] A good use of circumvention
Send reply to: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
>
> From "http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,53157,00.html", about a new
> bin Laden video:
>
> "He said the film was on a CD-ROM, which the reporter brought to Britain
> 10 days ago. The CD-ROM contained a password, which the agency managed
> to unlock last week."
>
> It kinda stinks that we couldn't do that in the US.
>
> mickeym
>
>