[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] 2600's request for rehearing en banc denied
- To: <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] 2600's request for rehearing en banc denied
- From: "Ernest Miller" <ernest.miller(at)aya.yale.edu>
- Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 08:27:43 -0400
- References: <F214uTkzORizvgzdxmD00012189@hotmail.com>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
I am optimistic that Eldred will win, but it not clear to me how decisive or
broad the win will be. Considering how screwed up the 2600 case has become,
I think it probably best to wait for another case or at least until Eldred
has been decided.
If Eldred is decided as favorably as I hope (not expect) it will be, then
the next DMCA case will give the defense a whole lot more ammo.
----- Original Message -----
From: "someone somewhere" <chaos755@hotmail.com>
To: <dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu>
Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2002 8:23 AM
Subject: [dvd-discuss] 2600's request for rehearing en banc denied
> Wired is reporting that 2600's request for rehearing en banc for the 2nd
> circuit court of appeals is denied.
>
> http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,52609,00.html
>
>
> Declan McCullagh seems to suggest that it might be better not to appeal to
> the supreme court, my guess on this is that with scotus recently accepting
> to hear eldred, they are willing to go against the ever increasing
strenght
> of copyright law.
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com