[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Court-sanctioned spying on users
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Court-sanctioned spying on users
- From: "Michael A Rolenz" <Michael.A.Rolenz(at)aero.org>
- Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 13:38:21 -0700
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
After reading about the judge that ordered AOL to remove a media player
from AOL 6.0 installations via the "upgrade" and this one, I can see that
some Judges need to be reeducated about the Constitution which is designed
to prevent such mischief. What this one seems to miss is that even if they
DO collect all this information, they didn't have it before and so it
cannot be used to inflate damages even if there is so much infringement
that the judge drops dead from a heart attack because he's never seen so
muchintellectual property raped pillaged and plundered.
Scott A Crosby <crosby@qwes.math.cmu.edu>
Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
05/03/02 12:49 PM
Please respond to dvd-discuss
To: <dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu>
cc:
Subject: [dvd-discuss] Court-sanctioned spying on users
http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/3186191.htm
``A federal magistrate in Los Angeles has ordered SonicBlue to spy on
thousands of digital video recorder users -- monitoring every show they
record, every commercial they skip and every program they send
electronically to a friend.''
--
I *CAN'T WAIT* till Microsoft gets this court order. (`` You are ordered
to collect information about every program run and every file opened and
copied '')
Yes, there's a reason my windows installation doesn't know about the
existance of the internet, much less know my name.
Scott