[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Anti-Spyware Program Targeted By Multimedia Player
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Anti-Spyware Program Targeted By Multimedia Player
- From: microlenz(at)earthlink.net
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 08:00:15 -0700
- In-reply-to: <55D41E46BAD58E4BBA52AA3798D6C6C72CDB2F@postal.fcci-group.com>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Except for the tiny print in the EULA....I love that statement "YOU are not
allowed...." SFB...it's MY machine!
The article states that CNET has removed radlight from its downloads...too bad
the 750,000 users won't ban together and file a class action suit....I doubt
the DoJ has figured out what to do with a company that distributes a virus.
On 25 Apr 2002 at 9:56, Dean Sanchez wrote:
Subject: [dvd-discuss] Anti-Spyware Program Targeted By Multimedia
Player
Date sent: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:56:22 -0400
From: "Dean Sanchez" <DSanchez@fcci-group.com>
To: "Dvd Discussion Group (E-mail)" <dvd-
discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu>
Send reply to: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> Slashdot and Newsbytes are reporting a new twist in spyway. It's amazing what a
> company can get away with now under the guise of protecting its "intellectual
> property". Radlight (a multimedia player) silently uninstalls the anti-spyware
> program AdAware. Its justification? The EULA states "You are not allowed to
> use any third party program (e.g., Ad-aware) to uninstall application bundled
> with RadLight. Such programs will be removed." Now, this is my definition of a
> viral program - modifying, installing, or uninstalling software without
> notifying me.
>
> http://www.newsbytes.com/news/02/176075.html