[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] The Consumer Technology Bill of Rights
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] The Consumer Technology Bill of Rights
- From: "Michael A Rolenz" <Michael.A.Rolenz(at)aero.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 08:11:20 -0800
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
In some ways the consumer bill of rights can be summarized as following
Any copy that you legally acquires becomes your personal property and you
may do with it as you wish as long as you do not sell or make available to
the public duplicate copies without approval of the copyright holder. C
Copyright holders may put no restrictions on the usage.
==================
ANd that includes DeCSS. If someone uses DeCSS on their own DVDs that
legal. Use it as part of commercial piracy, and the piracy is illegal.
"Dean Sanchez" <DSanchez@fcci-group.com>
Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
03/18/02 06:18 AM
Please respond to dvd-discuss
To: <dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu>
cc:
Subject: [dvd-discuss] The Consumer Technology Bill of Rights
Bob Thompson's site, http://www.ttgnet.com/rbt/rbtdaynotes.html , has a link to a site, http://www.digitalconsumer.org , that is promoting a 'Bill of Rights' for consumers.
I know nothing about the site aside from what I've read on the it.
However, I think that the premise behind it has merit, but I would like to
see something similar to the Ninth and Tenth Amendments of the
Constitution added to it. Maybe something along the lines of "Enumeration
in this Bill of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage
others retained by the user. The Rights not specifically delegated to the
Copyright Holder are reserved to the user." And maybe replace 'user' with
'People' to reflect the fact that we hold these rights as citizens not
just consumers.,
I know that we had discussed in the past the problems related to
enumerating the rights conferred through 'fair use' and 'first sale'.
Primarily, the fact that the process of sayings 'these are the right'
would eliminate any right to new uses. However, I think that we have
reached a point where, because no rights have be enumerated, the
traditional 'fair use' and 'first sale' rights have eroded to such an
extent that we no longer have them anyway. As for adding any new ones,
that possibility no longer exists.