[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Re: [dvd-discuss digest] V #12
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Re: [dvd-discuss digest] V #12
- From: "Michael A Rolenz" <Michael.A.Rolenz(at)aero.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 07:44:58 -0800
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Good points...it still boggles my brain that the Senators can't seem to
get it throught their heads the thought that if Intel spends more on R&D
than Hollywood takes in as revenues, then MAYBE you might want to listen
to them before smarmy Jack Valenti. Add to that IBM, Compaq, Microsoft,
and a $600B Telecommunications agency and start to think of the "Goose
that laid the golden egg"
Tom <tom@lemuria.org>
Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
03/16/02 03:04 PM
Please respond to dvd-discuss
To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
cc:
Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Re: [dvd-discuss digest] V #12
On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 12:06:27PM -0600, Tim Neu wrote:
> Copyright resembles a protection racket more than a social contract
> nowadays.
>
> Adds a whole new meaning to the term "Movie Mafia".
bingo.
there's a reason I like the term so much. there's also one more thing
they have in commong: total disregard of the interests of other people.
their world revolves around themselves, nothing else.
--
http://web.lemuria.org/pubkey.html
pub 1024D/D88D35A6 2001-11-14 Tom Vogt <tom@lemuria.org>
Key fingerprint = 276B B7BB E4D8 FCCE DB8F F965 310B 811A D88D 35A6