[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Security Systems Standards Certification Act [SSSCA]
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Security Systems Standards Certification Act [SSSCA]
- From: microlenz(at)earthlink.net
- Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 18:51:57 -0800
- In-reply-to: <20020315204150.A17869@steelballs.org>
- References: <3C923A6D.9461.E74AD@localhost>; from microlenz@earthlink.net on Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 06:16:13PM -0800
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
I'd forgotten that.....*&%$#@ed!! merger mania. THAT may be the whole question
of the meeting. WHere does AOL come out in the matter?
Date sent: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 20:41:50 -0600
From: Charles Ballowe <hangman@steelballs.org>
To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Security Systems Standards Certification Act
[SSSCA]
Send reply to: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 06:16:13PM -0800, microlenz@earthlink.net wrote:
> > Those would be worthy additions....but remember the intel testimony? COnsider
> > too that RealNetworks, AOL and Yahoo are are in the situation that they have
> > customers who want content that they can't provide. THey have customers who
> > want stuff to work with that they can't (e.g. Mickey Mouse).It could get
> > interesting...or not... But I'd have to agree about watching it...IT might be
> > interesting to read a transcript later
>
> But AOL is also Time-Warner -- depending on which portion is stronger,
> that could lead to some interesting internal strugles.