[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Blizzard / Battlenet FAQ
- To: <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Blizzard / Battlenet FAQ
- From: John Galt <galt(at)inconnu.isu.edu>
- Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 18:06:21 -0700 (MST)
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0203081923380.25002-100000@qwe3.math.cmu.edu>
- Mail-followup-to: galt@inconnu.isu.edu
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Scott A Crosby wrote:
>On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Michael A Rolenz wrote:
>
>> They still might have a theft of service argument because the the clones
>> are taking "service" away from the non clones...not saying that I'd buy it
>> but it may be their "legal theory" to try to use as a club over somepeople
>> who were smarter than they.
>>
>
>This is bullshit..
>
>If someone gives out, say, bar code scanners free to many people, where
>the software for those scanners connects the barcodes to their site for
>(say) UPC and other lookups.
>
>Then, assuming no prior contractual restrictions. (Are 'clickwrap
>licenses' contracts?)
>
>There's no way you can construe it as theft of service for me to set up a
>clone UPC code database and clone software that the scanners can use.
Ask Digital Convergence. It seems that they disagree....
>Scott
>
>
- --
There is an old saying that if a million monkeys typed on a million
keyboards for a million years, eventually all the works of Shakespeare
would be produced. Now, thanks to Usenet, we know this is not true.
Who is John Galt? galt@inconnu.isu.edu, that's who!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76
iD8DBQE8iWAP+ZSKG3nWr3ARAt6LAKDKqU2yLyA3USa7Fs9VStKFjfZRrwCbBeEA
UA1aD6EFcav1YxjzSfeZ15A=
=mtYh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----