[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Blizzard / Battlenet FAQ
- To: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Blizzard / Battlenet FAQ
- From: Tim Neu <tim(at)tneu.visi.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 20:19:49 -0600 (CST)
- In-reply-to: <E06ADA0073926048AD304115DD8AB6BC9D69D1@mail.onetouch.com>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Richard Hartman wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: tneu@smithmicrotech.com [mailto:tneu@smithmicrotech.com]
> ...
> > The Intellectual Property Peddlers did it again. They got
> > me riled up
> > enough to write another anti-FAQ.
> >
> > As usual, please post any recommended improvements.
> >
> > http://www.visi.com/~tneu/blizzard.html
> >
> >
>
> Q: How do CD keys help reduce piracy?
>
>
> Blizzard: Blizzard uses two main methods to combat piracy: disc-based copy
> protection and CD keys. As part of the login process, Battle.net
> authenticates the user's CD key and prevents people from logging in with the
> same key or an invalid key.
>
>
>
> tneu: These precautions are typical of software products, however, they have
> no legal bearing on the matter. Assuming someone has purchased a copy of the
> software in question, they are free to use it - even if they choose to
> access an emulated server rather than the company's own.
>
> rmh: this is what makes the battle.net clones a "circumvention device" under
> the DMCA. if the clones performed the same authentication, then you could
> run
> under the free market competetion w/ far less chance of Blizzard being able
> to pursue a _successful_ lawsuit. The question is: how important to the
> BattleNet clones to bypass the CD key authentication? Is it worth being
> shut down? If all you want to do is compete, you may as well do so with
> less
> legal exposure. If you want to make a statement about the DMCA and become
> the next poster child in court (and we _do_ need one), keep on truckin'
I'm not sure if this is an old email, or not (it seem vaguely familiar).
The battlenet clones offered to implement CD-authentication, only to have
blizzard refuse to co-operate. So, it would seem that if bnetd is a
circumvention device, it is so only because reverse engineering the
CD authentication would be illegal under the DMCA and blizzard did not
provide any other means of implementing it.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
______ _ __ Military Intelligence
/ ' ) ) -KC0LQL- Honest Politician
/ o ______ / / _ . . Intellectual Property
/ <_/ / / < / (_</_(_/_ -- tneu@visi.com / http://www.visi.com/~tneu --