[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Slightly OT - Japanese copyrights
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Slightly OT - Japanese copyrights
- From: Noah silva <nsilva(at)atari-source.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 12:03:20 -0500 (EST)
- In-reply-to: <200202281416.JAA10058@emperor.elkrdg01.md.comcast.net>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
I suppose it wouldn't, but it might be a trademark violation. At least a
company with a stance like Adobe would claim it was. (because you are
misrepresenting your hybrid product as their product, and it might not
have the quality that consumers expect from company XYZ).
-- noah silva
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Jim Bauer wrote:
> Noah silva <nsilva@atari-source.com> wrote:
> >
> >It might be a violation of copyright to take something and sub-title it
> >and re-release it (I would think it would be!).
>
> Would it be a violation to sell a sub-titled version if you
> bought and destroyed an original for every sub-titled copy
> you distributed?
>
>
> --
> Jim Bauer, jfbauer@comcast.net
>