[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Eldred v. Ashcroft Accepted for ReviewbySCOTUS
- To: <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Eldred v. Ashcroft Accepted for ReviewbySCOTUS
- From: Ole Craig <olc(at)cs.umass.edu>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 18:59:34 -0500 (EST)
- In-reply-to: <OFF2C092CB.A1CA34BE-ON88256B66.0080F361@aero.org>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
On 02/20/02 at 15:36, 'twas brillig and Michael A Rolenz scrobe:
> Progress has nothing to do with maximizing anything. It has to do with
> increasing rather than stagnating or regressing. It's not having the best
> it's making things better. Finding the optimums for some quantity or
> strategy (e.g., optimal control) is intellectually seductive but a
> pragmatically a pointless exercise.The only things that can be optimized
> are simplistic models (e.g., Posner and Landes) that are based upon
> questionable assumptions as well as not being structurally stable under
> small perturbations or even unique(e..g, whatif the function ISN"T convex)
> as well as ignoring many other aspects.
>
For the record (and because I've gotten no less than THREE
emails in the space of five minutes "explaining" various things to me)
I agree completely with Michael R. -- I was merely trying to point out
that *even on it's own terms* P&L smells higher than a three-days-dead
horse.
Ole
--
Ole Craig * olc@cs.umass.edu * UNIX; postmaster, news, web; SGI martyr *
CS Computing Facility, UMass * <www.cs.umass.edu/~olc/> for public key
perl -e 'print$i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);'