[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Definition of "Manufacturing"
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Definition of "Manufacturing"
- From: "John Zulauf" <johnzu(at)ia.nsc.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 13:47:34 -0700
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0202011527230.3259-100000@sparcy.internal.lan>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Software is engineering (authoring) followed by distribution
(publishing).
Now, if publishing a book is considering mfg -- then so should stamping
and selling software -- else then no.
Why do people have to make stuff so difficult?
.002
Noah silva wrote:
>
> You know I saw a memo internal to our company the other day, our french
> parent company sent instructions, mentioning "blah blah blah... software
> manufacturer... blah blah". I know it is probably because it was
> translated, but I thought "uhm.. software isn't manufactured, just the
> media is".
>
> I think this is important. As a software author, I would like to see my
> works recieve protection, but I think that software is a creative effort,
> not a manufacturing one. It certainly can't be both.
>
> -- noah silva
>
> On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, mickey wrote:
>
> >
> > This is an editorial about an effort to broaden the definition of
> > "manufacturing" to include software production:
> >
> > http://www.manufacturingcenter.com/tooling/archives/0701/0701ed.asp
> >
> > It caught my eye because of the parallel to the "software != device"
> > discussions.
> >
> > mickeym
> >
> >
> >