[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] [openlaw] Governmenttakesmoreextremelineinsecond "Eldred" case
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:15:46 -0800, "Michael A Rolenz"
<Michael.A.Rolenz@aero.org> wrote:
>One tantalizing question is the fact that the UMP CDs do not adhere to the
>standards created almost 20yrs ago. IN that sense they are deliberatly
>defective. I don't think any legal scholars have ever addressed what sort
>of liability a company incurs by deliberatly creating defective goods for
>the market place. To my way of thinking that constitutes bad faith and
>should set them up for consequential damages if not punitive ones.
>
I think that's why they include the return link.
Any class action suit (or expert witness) would have to refer to the Red Book
for audio CD.
__________NO-∞-DO__________