[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] [openlaw] Government takes more extreme line in second"Eldred" case
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] [openlaw] Government takes more extreme line in second"Eldred" case
- From: Tom <tom(at)lemuria.org>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 10:47:05 +0100
- In-reply-to: <3C3E7FB9.A95A1D38@swbell.net>; from tjolley@swbell.net on Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 12:01:29AM -0600
- References: <200201092348.g09NmOv25979@eon.law.harvard.edu> <3C3E7FB9.A95A1D38@swbell.net>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 12:01:29AM -0600, Jolley wrote:
> If an author can't recoup his expenses 70 years after he's dead I don't
> think he's going to recoup them given another 25.
speaking of "recoup" in connection with a timeframe that lies after
someone's DEATH strikes me as odd. I know the "heirs and widows"
argument, but nevertheless, the formulation and intend is quite weird.
--
http://web.lemuria.org/pubkey.html
pub 1024D/D88D35A6 2001-11-14 Tom Vogt <tom@lemuria.org>
Key fingerprint = 276B B7BB E4D8 FCCE DB8F F965 310B 811A D88D 35A6