[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[dvd-discuss] Interpreting the Jaszi graph
- To: dvd-discuss(at)lweb.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: [dvd-discuss] Interpreting the Jaszi graph
- From: John Schulien <jms(at)johns.cc.uic.edu>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 17:04:28 -0600
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
> Peter Jaszi put together a nice graphic of the incredible shrinking
public
> domain, as compared to the growth it would have had if copyrights had
> expired as planned ...
Here's the description from the PDF:
| Although the number of creators and creations has grown
| over time, every term extension has created a period of "zero
| growth" in the public domain as shown in chart i.
<http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/openlaw/eldredvashcroft/pubdomain.html>
I'm completely baffled by this graphic.
o What exactly does the Y axis represent?
o What is the meaning of the purple area?
The grey area? Is this the number of
works? Percentage of works? Something
else?
o Why doess the graph appear linear, when
the growth of published works has been
exponential?
o Prior to 1978, any work published without
proper copyright notice immediately entered
the public domain. How does this fit in
to the "zero growth" areas of the graph?
o During the "zero growth" periods, 1831,
1909, 1962, many works, entered the public
domain due to failure to renew copyright.
Are those not represented on the chart, or
is the number of unrenewed copyrights
negligable? I thought that it was the
other way around -- that only a very small
percentage of copyrighted works had their
copyright renewed.
o Note that with the renewal requirement
removed, and automatic copyright protection
for all works, we ARE now in a situation
of zero growth of the public domain --
but this is only since 1976.
o If the public domain was growing at a large
"Y" value in 1831, then drops to zero, why
does it start at zero 14 years later when
copyright expirations resume, instead of
picking up where it left off?
Does anyone have a better understanding of
this graph?