[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] adobe DMCA letters
- To: dvd-discuss(at)lweb.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] adobe DMCA letters
- From: Sham Gardner <mail(at)risctaker.inka.de>
- Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 10:58:37 +0100
- In-reply-to: <20011221104459.B12827@lemuria.org>; from tom@lemuria.org on Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 10:44:59AM +0100
- References: <20011221104459.B12827@lemuria.org>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- User-agent: Mutt/1.0i
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 10:44:59AM +0100, Tom wrote:
> BayTSP hereby swears under penalty of perjury that BayTSP is authorized to
> act on behalf of Adobe Systems Inc. for matters pertaining to notification
> of infringements of its exclusive rights in its copyrighted material.
This is unbelievable, they're not even bothering to swear that they believe
their claims to be true anymore.
--
http://sites.inka.de/risctaker/DeCSS/
"DVDCCA's statutory right to protect its economically valuable trade secret
is not an interest that is 'more fundamental' than the First Amendment right
to freedom of speech [...] Accordingly, we are compelled to reverse the
preliminary injunction." (California Appeals Court)