[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] two articles
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] two articles
- From: "Michael A Rolenz" <Michael.A.Rolenz(at)aero.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 14:18:44 -0800
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
It's control....Levi's wants to control who distributed their jeans and
who doesn't to undercut those graymarketters.....reminds me of M$......
Noah silva <nsilva@atari-source.com>
Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
11/20/01 01:48 PM
Please respond to dvd-discuss
To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
cc:
Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] two articles
I don't see what the second case has to do with trademark at all. If they
were actually Levi jeans.. then there was no trademark violation IMO.
-- noah silva
>
> The second reports that the "First Sale" doctrines do not trump
> trademark rights in the European Union. Levi Strauss sued Tesco to stop
> Tesco from reimporting American Levi jeans andd reselling them in their
> UK supermarkets at cut rate prices.
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A59520-2001Nov20.html
>
>