[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Interesting 1st sale-shrinkwrap-EULA-(c)infringementcase
- To: Openlaw DMCA Forum <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Interesting 1st sale-shrinkwrap-EULA-(c)infringementcase
- From: Jeme A Brelin <jeme(at)brelin.net>
- Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 13:00:17 -0800 (PST)
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0111020956280.19515-100000@sparcy.internal.lan>
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, Noah silva wrote:
> So let me be stupid here and ask... What happens when someone who
> wants to do something against (GPL, BSD Lisence, MPL, SISSL, LGPL,
> etc.) claims he isn't bound by the lisence because he has "first sale"
> (or first gift?).
First sale doesn't give you the right to redistribute copies... certainly
not commercially.
I don't see how you could violate any of those licenses by practicing the
rights transfered at first sale.
J.
--
-----------------
Jeme A Brelin
jeme@brelin.net
-----------------
[cc] counter-copyright
http://www.openlaw.org