[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re[2]: [dvd-discuss] EFF opposes blacklisting spammers
- To: Openlaw DMCA Forum <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: Re[2]: [dvd-discuss] EFF opposes blacklisting spammers
- From: Jeme A Brelin <jeme(at)brelin.net>
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 18:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
- In-Reply-To: <20011020002520.37680.qmail@web13905.mail.yahoo.com>
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Bryan Taylor wrote:
> First, private entities don't owe you due process, nor do they owe you
> an explaination for why they ostracize you.
One of the MANY reasons why economic power can be so horribly destructive.
There is no public interest that supercedes a business' drive to increase
profits.
> If I want to delegate filtering according to the MAPS list without
> needing to know the details, I am free to do that. If I change my mind
> I can ask to see the list. When they refuse, per their policy, I can
> change my email provider.
You seem to believe there is always a better provider out there who can
meet all the good things you've got today PLUS the things you're missing
at a reasonable price.
This is simply not true and as the industries consolidate, the idea
becomes more absurd.
J.
--
-----------------
Jeme A Brelin
jeme@brelin.net
-----------------
[cc] counter-copyright
http://www.openlaw.org