[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] EFF opposes blacklisting spammers
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] EFF opposes blacklisting spammers
- From: Tom <tom(at)lemuria.org>
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 19:53:07 +0200
- In-Reply-To: <OFB8A42140.6D32C4E0-ON88256AEA.0060E013@aero.org>; from Michael.A.Rolenz@aero.org on Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 10:41:51AM -0700
- References: <OFB8A42140.6D32C4E0-ON88256AEA.0060E013@aero.org>
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 10:41:51AM -0700, Michael.A.Rolenz@aero.org wrote:
> And such things would be actionable in court. Wrongly putting someone's
> name on www.childmolesters.com not only would constitute defamation of
> character (asserting that someone performs criminal acts, actionable in
> California ) but may also allow punitive damages (fraud, oppression, or
> malice).
none of which will offset the damage done to you in that everyone in
your small town sees you as a child abuser, ignorant of the lawsuit
that went on someplace far away.
--
-- http://web.lemuria.org
--