RE: [dvd-discuss] Hang the RIAA in their own noose.

[Michael.A.Rolenz(at)aero.org]

I believe also that the dvd-discuss is "copylefted" as is the TWIKI 
discussion. As long as the NYT doesn't appropriated it without 
attribution, I wish they would reprint or digest some of it!




Noah silva <nsilva@atari-source.com>
Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
10/17/01 04:41 PM
Please respond to dvd-discuss

 
        To:     "'dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu>
        cc: 
        Subject:        RE: [dvd-discuss] Hang the RIAA in their own noose.


> much more sense than working in the "physical space".  And
> in the _model_ I have posted one copy for all on this list
> to read.  If the NYT wants to publish this on paper, they
> would have to ask permission.

Except that if the web archive is considered public, then you are
knowingly posting to a public place, so I think the times copying it is
just taking a public document and distributing it.

(and at any rate, I certainly wouldn't post top-secret info to this list).

 -- noah silva