[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] More news from the EFF on slashdot
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] More news from the EFF on slashdot
- From: Bryan Taylor <bryan_w_taylor(at)yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 10:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110110328510.9867-100000@leo.tneu.visi.com>
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
--- Tim Neu <tim@tneu.visi.com> wrote:
> http://www.eff.org/Legal/Cases/Felten_v_RIAA/20010925_doj_mtd_memo.pdf
My favorite part is:
"2. Plaintiffs' Claim Does Not Admit of Conclusive Relief, As The Applicability
of the DMCA to Their Conduct Is Contingent on The Precise Papers They Intend to
Publish, Which Plaintiffs Have Not Yet Articulated."
Is this not the very definition of content based regulation? In one court we
are told we don't have to look at the content and in another we are told we do!
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com