[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] [declan@well.com: FC: Congress considers encryption restrictions in response to attacks]
- To: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] [declan@well.com: FC: Congress considers encryption restrictions in response to attacks]
- From: Richard Hartman <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 08:55:53 -0700
- Cc: Declan McCullagh <declan(at)well.com>
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rik van Riel [mailto:riel@conectiva.com.br]
...
> OK, somebody needs to tell Congress that people who have
> the determination and nerve to fly airplanes into buildings
> or do suicide bombings on shopping centers are unlikely to
> be intimidated by software regulations.
>
You mean "when cryptography is outlawed, only outlaws will
have cryptography" ?
Mais naturellement. (Wait ... is using a foreign language
in e-mail an encryption mechanism?)
--
-Richard M. Hartman
hartman@onetouch.com
186,000 mi./sec ... not just a good idea, it's the LAW!