[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Latest RIAA Tactic- Impersonating a Police Officer
Richard wrote this in reply to my email, so I'm going to assume it was
intended as a reply even though it was top-posted with no contextual
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Richard Hartman wrote:
> Copyright infringement and the DMCA are two separate things.
So? My point still stands.
> The DMCA enforces the removal by technological means of use rights that
> we nonetheless retain under actual copyright law. This bypasses the
> entire legal system and puts the force of law behind the whims of the
> media interest groups. This is arguably unconstitutional in the way
> that "due process" is negated, and should be opposed by any and every
> means available.
> Copyright is a long-standing
This doesn't mean I can't disagree with it and work to change it...
including civil disobedience of the law.
> and useful practice.
This is arguable. I, personally, disagree... at least with the way the
law is written and has been for the past hundred years or so.
> True, recent legislation has (over)extended copyright to the point of
> idiocy, but the concept of copyright itself is nonetheless worth
Again, that's an opinion I don't share.
> I might support _limited_ "civil disobedience" regarding copyright
> infringement if you put some sort of boundary on it, such as respecting
> a shorter term but anything over X years is considered "public domain"
> by your protest group, however the attituted conveyed by your question
> "Why shouldn't anybody condone copyright infringement?" seems to go
> beyond that.
A more appropriate question would have been "Why should nobody condone
copyright infringement?" That question is a more direct response to
Michael's comment and closer to the spirit of my intent.
I will go on to say, for clarification, that I believe the copyright of
works of fine art is inappropriate and also inconsistent with the intent
and wording of the copyright clause. It is stifling to culture and a
hinderance to human development.
Furthermore, I believe that the current system of state protection of
exclusive publication rights has created a publishing oligopoly that is
at least as much a barrier to the production of new work as a
copyright-free system would be. The purported public benefit of copyright
simply does not exist.
Jeme A Brelin