[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Mobile phone cameras used for Digital shoplifting?
- To: dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Mobile phone cameras used for Digital shoplifting?
- From: Sham Gardner <mail(at)risctaker.inka.de>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 08:31:05 +0200
- In-reply-to: <3F008B5B.5665.1232BC@localhost>; from email@example.com on Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 07:11:23PM -0700
- References: <410-220036130154520642@M2W081.mail2web.com> <3F008B5B.5665.1232BC@localhost>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- User-agent: Mutt/1.0i
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 07:11:23PM -0700, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> > Aren't a lot of these magazines just one large advertisement anyways...
> > So the product or style is advertised. The magazines are paid by
> > advertisers. The system is still working, isn't it?
> For the advertiser not the store owners....
However the thing is, according to the article, it's *not* the store owners
that are complaining about this, but the publishers. The store owners would
also be in a better position to do something about it, if they really wanted
"The essence of the evil government is that it anticipates bad conduct
on the part if its citizens. Any overnment which assumes that the
population is going to do something evil has already lost its
franchise to govern." (Philip K. Dick)