[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Public Domain Enhancement Bill
- To: <dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Public Domain Enhancement Bill
- From: "Richard Hartman" <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:46:55 -0700
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Thread-index: AcM8zMS+TYU0pXD7Qpeu4y6toG+58wAB0NXA
- Thread-topic: [dvd-discuss] Public Domain Enhancement Bill
Heck, it'd still be pretty darned hard to get any
significant percentage of material under copyright
for that matter. That's a _lot_ of material!
--
-Richard M. Hartman
hartman@onetouch.com
186,000 mi/sec: not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeme A Brelin [mailto:jeme@brelin.net]
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:55 AM
> To: Openlaw DMCA Forum
> Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Public Domain Enhancement Bill
>
>
>
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Michael A Rolenz wrote:
> > The question was not that Disney owns idea but if Disney
> owns say 90% of
> > copyrighted material, then practically nothing enters the PD. The
> > question is if that is harmful?
>
> To state more directly what Richard put very clearly and
> subtley: Disney
> may, at some point, own 90% of COPYRIGHTED material, but that
> is always an
> insignificant percentage of COPYRIGHTABLE material.
>
> At least, the prevailing theory is that human thought and
> expression is
> infinite.
>
> J.
> --
> -----------------
> Jeme A Brelin
> jeme@brelin.net
> -----------------
> [cc] counter-copyright
> http://www.openlaw.org
>